With more than 36 years experience as a private investigator, in 1989, I
began to devote my practice exclusively to studies and cases dealing with
false allegations of child sexual abuse, criminal defense, legal malpractice
and overturning convictions for the innocent. Education has included attending
numerous seminars, a vast amount of legal research, case history studies
and conducting interviews with experts worldwide, including child advocates,
judges, attorneys, medical doctors, psychologists, psychiatrists, research
specialists, professors, investigators plus prior victims of false allegations
and their families.
My interest and obsession with these cases originated after observing the
aftermath of three cases where there was absolutely no abuse whatsoever,
yet the victims of the allegations were all but destroyed.
In the first, what began as a child custody investigation, we had been retained
by a child's father to gather evidence that the child's mother was unfit.
That evidence was obtained and the father filed a complaint asking the courts
to award him the custody of his daughter.
Almost immediately after the complaint was filed by the father, he was arrested
and charged with sexually molesting his daughter. There had never been even
a hint of sexual misconduct on the part of the father prior to his filing
his petition asking for the custody of his daughter.
Following his arrest, I talked at length with my client's attorneys regarding
the allegations. Laughingly, they told me that no investigation was necessary
because anyone could see that the charges were false and why the mother had
filed them. They even went so far as to state that they were not concerned,
but obviously, that opinion quickly changed when a jury heard his child testify
and convicted him.
In the second case, one that we followed to the end, I received my initial
telephone call from a mother in Colorado, who told me that she was married,
but separated and that her nine-year-old son had been sexually abused by
her husband while they were living in Arizona. She said she wanted me to
prove it.
I went to Colorado and spent a great deal of time with the mother and her
son. There were police agencies involved in Arizona and in Colorado, but
no arrests had been made. The young boy had successfully passed a lie detector
test stating that he had been abused and was seeing several counselors, who
were also convinced he had been sexually molested.
As a bit of history, the mother had lived in Arizona and worked as a singer
with a band at a resort where she met her husband. After he showered her
with money and promises of furthering her career, she married him. They moved
to Colorado and shortly thereafter, he left her. She had no job and all the
promises made to her, career wise, vanished.
There was a great deal of investigative work involved, including the fact
that I was able to get this woman's job back for her in Arizona. She did
not leave that job in the best of standing when she married and departed
for Colorado with very little or no notice.
After spending quite a bit of time with her son, especially while she worked
evenings, we developed a close enough relationship where he felt comfortable
talking to me. I never pressured him with any questions regarding the alleged
abuse, but one night as we were sitting at a table in the kitchen playing
a game, he looked at me and said, "you know it didn't happen, don't you."
I told him I didn't know and asked him if he wanted to talk about it.
He began by telling me that his mother married "that man," with a great deal
of hate in his voice. Then, crying, he continued by saying that he and his
mother had moved to Colorado with "him" and almost immediately thereafter,
he left them. He said it hurt his mama and she cried a lot.
One night, as he watched, she stood in the utility room where her washing
machine was, crying and beating the washer and dryer with a hammer. He had
never seen his mother hurt like that and knew "that man" caused it. All he
could think about was hurting the man who hurt his mother so he told her
the man touched him.
We talked about it for quite a while after which we drove and picked his
mother up from work. When arrived back home, we all sat down and I explained
that her son had something he wanted to tell her. He broke down crying and
told her that he had lied. She was speechless and asked him, "how could you
do this to me." I explained to her how he had been hurt and that he was striking
back because of his love for her. More importantly, I told her that she could
thank God he had not been molested. She calmed down and appeared to accept
it.
The following day, as we were driving to the airport for me to return to
Mississippi, the mother asked me what she should tell her mother. I told
her to tell the truth and to explain why he had made the accusations.
I returned to Jackson, Mississippi feeling very good that the problem had
worked itself out and that the young boy was not molested, but that was short
lived. The following day I received a telephone call from the mother. She
was hysterical. She told me that I was a fraud, said that her son had been
molested, said she wanted her money back and told me I would be hearing from
her attorney. She abruptly hung up without allowing me to offer any response
or ask any questions.
Shortly thereafter I received a letter from a local attorney threatening
me with everything from fraud to extortion and demanding that the fee I had
received be returned to my client. I responded by advising him to do whatever
he felt he needed to do. That attorney had been given only one side, yet
was quick to label me as a fraud.
The fact was, her son was never molested and when he told his mother he had
lied, that was a source of extreme embarrassment for her so she pressured
him until he had no choice other than to return to his original story which
made me a fraud. Was I? Well, the same woman contacted my office approximately
one year later. I was not available, but she told my office manager that
I had been right. She said that her son had not been molested and that she
reconciled with the very man her son claimed had sexually molested him. That
young boy was never molested, yet he convinced a polygraph examiner, several
investigators and several therapists that he had been.
Amazingly, I talked to one of the polygraph examiners who tested the boy
and who told me that the boy did have problems with the test, but he attributed
that to nervousness. He stated flatly that he was not concerned about the
test results and that he was positive the boy was not lying because being
sexually abused was not something a 9-year old would lie about.
The third case involved a man who was convicted and sentenced to thirty-two
years in prison, based on charges that he sexually molested two of his daughters
and his niece. Without question, he was innocent. I assisted that boy's family
prior to his trial and obtained sworn affidavits from his daughters, stating
that they had never been molested. His daughters even testified at his trial
that they were not molested, but because a state appointed psychologist said
it was her opinion that they had been, he was convicted.
Because cases such as these prove that "false allegations" are real and destroy
people, we began specializing in defense preparation aimed at keeping innocent
people from being convicted.
In addition to our investigative efforts in the area of false allegations
of sexual abuse, our extensive research has aided us in assisting many of
our clients, acting Pro Se, (without an attorney), in their preparation of
Appellant Briefs for the Supreme Court, Petitions for Writ of Habeas Corpus
and with civil complaints they filed against district attorneys, their former
attorneys, psychologists and so-called child advocates. In those cases, we
were not attempting to practice law nor presenting ourself to anyone as being
an attorney. We simply had no alternative. These clients had no attorney
and in many cases were convicted simply because of ineffective assistance
of counsel.
The shame of it is, there are hundreds of people in prison, charged with
sexual abuse, who are honestly innocent. In many of those cases, children
got mad, made an accusation that they were abused and our "system professionals"
simply validated the accusations but made no effort whatsoever to determine
the real truth. This is a perfect example of our system being completely
out-of-control. These cases are extremely difficult simply because you must
be prepared to fight an entire system that includes district attorneys,
attorneys, psychologists, social services, child advocates, law enforcement,
youth courts and others. Not many are willing to do that, but we are and
will continue to do so.
In short, we are willing to travel anywhere and challenge any opposition
necessary to right an injustice, even when others say it can't be done. Something
can't be done only when there is no real desire to do it. That is one of
the major reasons why there are innocent people in prison today. No one really
cared enough to do what was necessary to prove their innocence. The truth
can always be found. If it isn't, the right person was not looking in the
right place. The "dragon" wins only if someone allows it.