Laws on Recording
Allen Cowling
Cowling Investigations, Inc.
You have accessed one of the many pages here at the Cowling Investigations, False Allegation Defense Website. Our main links are located at the bottom of this page. For an explanation of how we handle a false allegation defense, see Our Expertise, We Can Help. |
Laws regarding the legality of recording by state constitutes one page of
a website designed to assist those facing a false accusation, false allegation
or false allegations of child abuse, sexual abuse or child molesting. For
additional topics, visit our False Allegation main page by clicking the link
at the bottom of this page.
Federal Law
-
The federal Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 2510 et seq., prohibits the willful interception of telephone communication
by means of any electronic, mechanical, or other device without an applicable
exemption.
Federal Exceptions
-
Consent: In the absence of more restrictive state law, it is permissible
to intercept and record a telephone conversation if one or both of the parties
to the call consents. Consent means authorization by only one participant
in the call; single-party consent is provided for by specific statutory exemption
under federal law. 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2511(2)(d).
Penalties
-
The federal statutes provide criminal penalties for unlawful interception
of telephone conversations, including up to five years' imprisonment or a
maximum of $10,000 in fines. They also allow for civil remedies, by which
private parties are entitled to recover actual and punitive damages, together
with fees and costs.
One Party States
-
One party to the conversation must have knowledge and give their consent
to the recording of the conversation. In the most simple terms, this means
that if you were having a conversation with another person and you "secretly"
recorded that conversation, since "one party," (you) were aware that the
recording was being done, no law was being violated. In the event the party
you had the conversation with later changes what they told you, the tape
could be used as rebuttal. This does not mean, nor does it imply that it
is "legal" to tape conversations that you are not a party to and without
question, that would be an invasion of privacy and a state and federal crime.
Two Party States
One Party States
Alabama |
Alaska |
Arizona |
Arkansas |
Colorado |
Washington DC |
Georgia |
Hawaii |
Idaho |
Indiana |
Iowa |
Kansas |
Kentucky |
Louisiana |
Maine |
Minnesota |
Mississippi |
Missouri |
Nebraska |
Nevada |
New Jersey |
New Mexico |
New York |
North Carolina |
North Dakota |
Oklahoma |
Oregon |
Ohio |
Rhode Island |
South Carolina |
South Dakota |
Tennessee |
Texas |
Utah |
Vermont |
Virginia |
West Virginia |
Wisconsin |
Wyoming |
Two Party States
California |
Connecticut |
Delaware |
Florida |
Illinois |
Massachusetts |
Maryland |
Michigan |
Montana |
New Hampshire |
Pennsylvania |
Washington |
|